WUFPAC has not pledged "not to vote for a white man" as you suggest. Our goal to “get Progressives — specifically Women, LGBTQ+, and People of Color — elected to public office" begins years before an election - encouraging women to discern whether running for public office is right for them and then journeying alongside them as they do so. I'm disappointed by the way you have misrepresented your neighbors.
Yes, that’s right. It’ll be interesting to see an actual campaign in 3 years: will we have a bigger voter turnout? Will the same people run? Can Sharon Tucker win a second term with the general public voting? I’m very hopeful with Mayor Tucker!
Nathan, I am not sure what you are insinuating, but this post comes across as deeply antagonistic towards the women that are in the caucus for mayor as well as the 4,000 women that are a part of this Facebook group. Please remember that people reading your posts are of different genders, sexual orientations, and political parties.
Thanks for taking the time to comment and flag this. Based on feedback from you and others, I've revised the article and sent out a note explaining why and apologizing for the tone of the original.
WUFPAC has not pledged "not to vote for a white man" as you suggest. Our goal to “get Progressives — specifically Women, LGBTQ+, and People of Color — elected to public office" begins years before an election - encouraging women to discern whether running for public office is right for them and then journeying alongside them as they do so. I'm disappointed by the way you have misrepresented your neighbors.
💯
It definitely comes across as sensationalized. Ultimately, this is all a blip in time until the general public gets a vote.
The general public won't get to vote in the mayor's race until November 2027.
Yes, that’s right. It’ll be interesting to see an actual campaign in 3 years: will we have a bigger voter turnout? Will the same people run? Can Sharon Tucker win a second term with the general public voting? I’m very hopeful with Mayor Tucker!
Nathan, I am not sure what you are insinuating, but this post comes across as deeply antagonistic towards the women that are in the caucus for mayor as well as the 4,000 women that are a part of this Facebook group. Please remember that people reading your posts are of different genders, sexual orientations, and political parties.
Thanks for taking the time to comment and flag this. Based on feedback from you and others, I've revised the article and sent out a note explaining why and apologizing for the tone of the original.
The version I just read seams honest not sensationalized or antagonistic. 🤷♀️ I just found these posts through Reddit.